June 23, 2024 12:31 am
Close this search box.

Local News

Georgia GOP lawmakers aim to put more teeth in state prosecutor oversight commission


Stanley Dunlap, Georgia Recorder
January 22, 2024

On Monday, a panel of Republican legislators advanced a bill designed to clear the path for a new prosecutors oversight commission to begin reviewing complaints after rejecting appeals from Democrats to have a say in who serves on the board. 

The House Judiciary Non-Civil Committee on Monday approved House Bill 881 that removes the Georgia Supreme Court from reviewing the rules for the Professional Attorneys Qualifications Commission that will determine whether a local prosecutor found to have committed willful or prejudicial misconduct or should be punished for not bringing cases against low-level offenses. A prosecutor could also be removed  if they are found to have mental or physical disabilities that impeded the ability to do their job. 

Despite being signed into law last year, the state Supreme Court declined to review the rules for the investigatory and hearing panels, stalling the commission’s ability to review complaints. In a November ruling, the justices expressed “grave doubts” about the Georgia’s highest court’s constitutional authority to adopt the commission’s rules and standards.

On Monday, the House committee passed the bill along party lines after GOP lawmakers rejected a proposal by Lithonia Democratic Rep. Dar’shun Kendrick to allow the leaders of the minority party to appoint two of the five hearing panel members.

Currently, the oversight commission members are appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor and, and House speaker, all of whom are Republicans. A Senate committee composed of the majority party leadership and the lieutenant governor also selects members to serve on the investigation and hearing panels. 

Rep. Shea Roberts, an Atlanta Democrat, said allowing both political parties to nominate members to a commission with enough power to disqualify district attorneys would be a fairer process. Democratic lawmakers also made the case Monday a potential conflict of interest could arise if complaints are filed by elected officials who also appointed panel members.

“I think the public would like to know that we’re trying to work in a bipartisan fashion, and that these members are going to be appointed in a bipartisan fashion,” Roberts said.

Dallas Republican Rep. Joseph Gullett said that his legislation allows the commission to officially adopt rules and a code of standards that it creates with the support of the Prosecutors Attorneys’ Council of Georgia.  

The legislation also adds language that a prosecutor’s appeal would be heard in the local superior court circuit represented by the district attorney targeted in the complaint. 

“When you’re a judge you pick winners and losers but at the end of the day, (the justices) didn’t pick a winner or loser, they just didn’t play the game,” Gullett said.

Rep. Steven Sainz said that the commission can avoid making politicized decisions while handling complaints such as whether a prosecutor is appropriately reviewing cases in their district. 

“Do you think there’s a political angle to ensuring that citizens across the state who’ve been victims of violent crimes, have the prosecutor’s office to lean on and ensure that those crimes get prosecuted,” the St. Marys Republican asked.

Prosecutors were divided over whether the commission is intended to hold them accountable in the same manner as similar oversight panels governing elected sheriffs and judges or if it would target prosecutors for making independent judgments about which cases to pursue. 

Forsyth County Solicitor General Bill Finch said he opposes a bill which interferes with the way local prosecutors handle cases, especially since the state does not provide any funding for his office to prosecute cases.

“There’s nothing in this bill that undergirds what my political party stands for. And I say that with deep respect and admiration for members of my party who have carried the flag of Republicanism for a very long time,” he said at Monday’s committee meeting.

Georgia Recorder is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Georgia Recorder maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor John McCosh for questions: info@georgiarecorder.com. Follow Georgia Recorder on Facebook and Twitter.

This article is republished from Georgia Recorder under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Georgia Supreme Court justices appear skeptical of Athens DA’s claim of open records exemption

In an upcoming ruling, Georgia’s Supreme Court will weigh in on a claim brought by Athens-Clarke District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez, arguing that top prosecutors are exempt from the state’s open records laws. The case involves assertions that the trial court overlooked a constitutional provision in denying Gonzalez’s motion to dismiss an open records complaint, mirroring similar immunity arguments made by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in a separate case related to the 2020 presidential election interference.

Georgia public colleges to expand admissions testing requirements for fall 2026

Georgia colleges are reverting to requiring standardized test scores for all new applicants, signaling a shift from pandemic-era policies. Beginning in fall 2026, institutions including Augusta University, The University of Georgia, and Georgia Tech will mandate SAT or ACT scores, a decision unanimously approved by the Georgia Board of Regents.

Water-hogging data centers flagged in latest ‘Dirty Dozen’ environmental watchdog report

In its annual report released on Thursday, the Georgia Water Coalition spotlighted the detrimental effects of record economic growth on the state’s waterways, particularly in the coastal region, where a surge in state-of-the-art data centers poses a significant threat to Georgia’s rivers. The report urges urgent action from public officials and residents to advocate for policies that safeguard natural resources crucial for clean drinking water and outdoor recreation, emphasizing the need for coordinated water planning to address mounting environmental pressures.